Welcome to the discussion on whether committing 120 hours of free chat on ImLive is worthwhile, especially for those who are already established on platforms like SM. This topic explores various perspectives on leveraging ImLive as an additional or alternative platform for webcam models. Here's a summary of the insights shared:
- Some models find ImLive to be highly profitable, especially when converting free members to paid ones, as 100% of the conversion fee goes to the model.
- The platform offers a "break button" feature, allowing models to temporarily set their room to private, simulating a paid chat environment. This feature is highlighted as beneficial for managing room dynamics without fully going offline.
- ImLive's strict no nudity policy in public chat is praised for helping models build a base of faithful regulars, both male and female.
- The platform provides opportunities to host happy hours and participate in parties to increase traffic and potential earnings. These features are especially highlighted as beneficial for attracting regulars.
- Models can take advantage of ImLive's functionality to take live pictures and record sessions for sale, providing additional revenue streams.
- The discussion touches on the technical feasibility of simultaneously streaming on ImLive and another platform, given adequate computing resources.
- Challenges with ImLive's customer support are mentioned, indicating some potential issues in resolving site-related problems.
- Concerns regarding the initial low per-minute rate and the flexibility of completing the 120 hours without a set deadline are also discussed.
This summary encapsulates key points from the conversation, providing valuable insights for models considering ImLive as part of their platform strategy.